Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 5:44:12 GMT
An outside opinion, to maintain a certain confidentiality, to validate references and, it must be recognized, in a certain number of cases, to externalize part of the responsibility. The hunters I have met tell me that it is due to the demand/pressure of their clients that they are less open to candidates outside the position. “If I propose candidates outside the position, I am told that we do not need a specialist to find them and that is not what I am paid for.” My client tells me: “I can find candidates outside the position too”. The French specialist in the network approach to finding a job: Hervé Bommelaer , indicates in one of his books that as soon as you are off the job, the phone rings significantly less and that you have lost a lot of attractiveness for a recruiter .
So, it is clearly not advisable to indicate “available”, “out of position”, “in transition” or “listening” on Email Data your profile. We can do it, in certain cases, when the transition lasts and the situation is pressing, some are displayed more clearly, but on the French market, it is not recommended. While being aware that we must obviously avoid providing false information. NO LIES. Constraint No. 2: the LinkedIn algorithm LinkedIn is developed on the West Coast of the USA. Seen from San Francisco, the Franco-French specificities of the job market that I mentioned in the previous point are a non-issue. I'm not even convinced that the LinkedIn devs know that in France you can be off-site as long as you don't show it.
Moreover, on the US job market where tensions are not the same, being “off post” is rather positive, it means that you are available fairly quickly. The French LinkedIn teams had the greatest difficulty explaining to their US colleagues why the “job seeker” subscription does not work here, unlike in the USA. One of the particularities of this subscription is being able to display a “job seeker” icon on your profile. Unsaleable in France / Essential in the United States. On LinkedIn, there is no “keyword” section but more important areas of the profile which therefore carry more weight in the algorithm. Keyword stuffing is ineffective: Jason S. had indicated his specialty more than 500 times in his profile, except... where it should be put. Result: no impact on its visibility, but a strange impression when arriving on its profile.
So, it is clearly not advisable to indicate “available”, “out of position”, “in transition” or “listening” on Email Data your profile. We can do it, in certain cases, when the transition lasts and the situation is pressing, some are displayed more clearly, but on the French market, it is not recommended. While being aware that we must obviously avoid providing false information. NO LIES. Constraint No. 2: the LinkedIn algorithm LinkedIn is developed on the West Coast of the USA. Seen from San Francisco, the Franco-French specificities of the job market that I mentioned in the previous point are a non-issue. I'm not even convinced that the LinkedIn devs know that in France you can be off-site as long as you don't show it.
Moreover, on the US job market where tensions are not the same, being “off post” is rather positive, it means that you are available fairly quickly. The French LinkedIn teams had the greatest difficulty explaining to their US colleagues why the “job seeker” subscription does not work here, unlike in the USA. One of the particularities of this subscription is being able to display a “job seeker” icon on your profile. Unsaleable in France / Essential in the United States. On LinkedIn, there is no “keyword” section but more important areas of the profile which therefore carry more weight in the algorithm. Keyword stuffing is ineffective: Jason S. had indicated his specialty more than 500 times in his profile, except... where it should be put. Result: no impact on its visibility, but a strange impression when arriving on its profile.